The Effect of the Discovery Learning Model with the Aptitude Treatment Interaction Strategy on the Ability to Understand Mathematical Concepts and Self-Efficacy of Class X Students of SMA 3 Tarakan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijmse.v3i1.287Keywords:
Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Discovery Learning, Mathematical, Self-Efficacy, TrigonometryAbstract
This study aims to: (1) Determine the effect of the discovery learning model with the aptitude treatment interaction strategy on the mathematical concept comprehension and self-efficacy of 10th-grade students at SMA Negeri 3 Tarakan; (2) Determine the effect of the discovery learning model with the aptitude treatment interaction strategy on the mathematical concept comprehension of 10th-grade students at SMA Negeri 3 Tarakan; (3) Determine the effect of the discovery learning model with the aptitude treatment interaction strategy on the self-efficacy of 10th-grade students at SMA Negeri 3 Tarakan. The research population included all tenth-grade students of SMA Negeri 3 Tarakan in the 2024/2025 academic year. The research sample consisted of two classes selected randomly: one experimental class receiving discovery learning with an aptitude treatment interaction strategy and one control class receiving conventional learning. The research instruments consisted of a test measuring mathematical concept understanding on trigonometry material and a self-efficacy questionnaire. The data obtained were tested for prerequisites through normality and homogeneity tests before being analyzed using inferential statistical tests in the form of an independent samples t-test with the assistance of SPSS software version 26.0. The research results show that the implementation of the discovery learning model with the aptitude-treatment interaction strategy has a significant impact on students' mathematical concept understanding and self-efficacy simultaneously, with a significance value of 0.006 < 0.05. Partially, this learning model has a significant effect on students' mathematical concept understanding, with a significance value of 0.018 < 0.05. However, the effect of the discovery learning model with the aptitude-treatment interaction strategy on students' self-efficacy is not statistically significant, as indicated by a significance value of 0.089 > 0.05, even though there is a tendency for increased self-efficacy among students participating in the experimental class learning. Nevertheless, the influence of the discovery learning model with the aptitude treatment interaction strategy on students' self-efficacy is not statistically significant in partial terms, although there is a tendency for an increase in self-efficacy among students participating in the experimental class. These findings suggest that the discovery learning model with the aptitude treatment interaction strategy is effective in improving students' understanding of mathematical concepts in trigonometry material and has the potential to support the development of self-efficacy in mathematics learning.
References
Amrani, H. (2019). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bruner, J. S. (1999). The process of education - A landmark in educational theory. Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (2019). The process of education. In The process of education.
Burns, M. K., Davidson, K., Zaslofsky, A. F., Parker, D. C., & Maki, K. E. (2017). The relationship between acquisition rate for words and working memory, short-term memory, and reading skills: Aptitude-by-treatment or skill-by-treatment interaction? Assessment for Effective Intervention, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508417730822
Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. Irvington.
De Zeeuw, A., Craig, T., & You, H. S. (2013). Assessing conceptual understanding in mathematics. Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2013.6685135
Dimopoulou, E. (2012). Self-efficacy and collective efficacy beliefs of teachers for children with autism. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 3(1), 609-620. https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2012.0082
Fifi Khsirun Nisa, & Elly Arliani. (2023). Junior high school students’ mathematical literacy in terms of mathematical self-efficacy. Jurnal Elemen, 9(1), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i1.7140
Fitri, I. (2017). Self-efficacy toward mathematics through the aptitude treatment interaction approach. JRPM (Journal of Mathematical Learning Review, 2(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2017.2.2.167-175
Hanafiah, N. (2012). Concept of learning strategies. Rafika Aditama.
Inda, I. M., & Widjayanti, D. B. (2018). The influence of the discovery learning model with the aptitude treatment interaction strategy on students' understanding of mathematical concepts and confidence. Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(1), 52-58.
Kent, G., & Foster, C. (2015). Re-conceptualising conceptual understanding in mathematics. Proceedings of Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 98-107.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2002). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
Maulidia, L. N., Anggraeni, A. D., Wulandari, E., Sari, M. N., Marlina, M., Hikmah, N., ... & Pentury, H. J. (2025). Active and creative learning strategies. Publisher Mifandi Mandiri Digital, 1(02).
Milligan, A., & Wood, B. (2010). Conceptual understandings as transition points: Making sense of a complex social world. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(4), 487-501.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume II): Where all students can succeed. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume III): What school life means for students' lives. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en
Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.193
Pamungkas, Y., & Afriansyah, E. (2017). Aptitude treatment interaction on students' mathematical comprehension ability. Journal of Mathematics Education RAFA, 3(1), 122-130. https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v3i1.1445
Rahmi, S., Nadia, R., Hasibah, B., & Hidayat, W. (2017). The relation between self-efficacy toward math with the math communication competence. Infinity Journal, 6(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.p177-182
Ross, A., & Wilson, V. (2012). The effects of representations, constructivist approaches, and engagement on middle school students' algebraic procedure and conceptual understanding. School Science and Mathematics, 12(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00125.x
Santrock, J. (2009). Educational psychology. McGraw-Hill.
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2014). Academic self-efficacy. In M. J. Furlong, R. Gilman, & E. S. Huebner (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools.
Serlina, S., & Leonard, L. (2021). The role of aptitude treatment interaction instructional model with task and forced instructional strategy on student mathematical reasoning ability. Journal of Instructional Development Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/jidr.v1i1.200
Snow, R. (1989). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. In P. Ackerman, R. J. Sternberg, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual differences. W.H. Freeman.
Suendarti, M., & Liberna, H. (2021). Analysis of the understanding of the concept of comparative trigonometry in high school students. JNPM (National Journal of Mathematics Education), 5(2), 326-339. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v5i2.4917
Uside, O. N., Barchock, K. H., & Abura, O. G. (2013). Effect of discovery method on secondary school students' achievement in physics in Kenya. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 2(3), 351-358.
Veermans, K. (2013). Intelligent support for discovery learning. Thesis. University of Twente. Netherlands: Twente University Press, 119-131.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Mathematics and Science Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


