The Use of Experimental Statistical Analysis to Enhance Understanding of Variable Relationships in Science Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsme.v2i3.261Keywords:
Analytical Reasoning, Experimental Design, Science Learning, Statistical Analysis, Variable RelationshipsAbstract
This study investigates the use of experimental statistical analysis as an instructional approach to enhance students’ understanding of variable relationships in science learning. Many students tend to memorize experimental results without comprehending the underlying relationships between variables, resulting in limited analytical reasoning and superficial understanding. To address this issue, the present study explores how integrating basic statistical tools-such as mean, correlation, and regression-into experimental activities can strengthen conceptual comprehension, analytical reasoning, and scientific literacy. Grounded in constructivist and inquiry-based learning frameworks, the research emphasizes active engagement, where students participate in data collection, analysis, and interpretation to draw evidence-based conclusions. The study employed a quasi-experimental design involving science students divided into experimental and control groups. Both groups conducted similar laboratory experiments, but only the experimental group received explicit instruction in statistical analysis. Data were collected through pre-tests and post-tests to measure changes in students’ understanding of variable relationships. The results indicated a 25% improvement in the experimental group’s comprehension and reasoning ability compared to the control group. Students who applied statistical analysis demonstrated greater proficiency in interpreting data, identifying causal patterns, and connecting theoretical knowledge to experimental findings. In contrast, students taught through traditional narrative-based instruction showed minimal gains and relied heavily on memorization. The findings highlight the effectiveness of integrating statistical reasoning in promoting critical thinking, problem-solving, and scientific reasoning skills.
References
Behr, A. S., Neuendorf, L. M., Sakthithasan, P., Karan, M., Fang, Q., Boettcher, K. E. R., Terkowsky, C., & Kockmann, N. (2023). Uniting knowledge and application in a hybrid laboratory experiment in virtual reality – A cross-reality laboratory with applications of artificial intelligence for Industry 4.0. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 763, 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42467-0_26
Biruni, I. B., Rahmana, A. Y., Evanda, E. T., Sofyan, M. A., Merindasya, M., Karomika, D., Fahruli, M. T. A., & Rachmad, Y. T. (2023). Potentials of problem-based learning to fostering students’ critical thinking and scientific literacy in a boarding school. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569, 060006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112236
Cazorla, I. M., Henriques, A., Correia, G. S., & Santana, C. V. (2021). The role of the ostensives in understanding quantitative statistical variables [O papel dos ostensivos na compreensão das variáveis estatísticas quantitativas]. Acta Scientiae, 23(4), 16–51. https://doi.org/10.17648/ACTA.SCIENTIAE.6532
Chan, S. W., Ismail, Z., & Sumintono, B. (2015). The impact of statistical reasoning learning environment: A Rasch analysis. Advanced Science Letters, 21(5), 1211–1215. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6077
Chance, B., Wong, J., & Tintle, N. (2016). Student performance in curricula centered on simulation-based inference: A preliminary report. Journal of Statistics Education, 24(3), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2016.1223529
Çil, E. (2015). Effect of two-tier diagnostic tests on promoting learners’ conceptual understanding of variables in conducting scientific experiments. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(4), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2015.1064124
de los Santos, O., Hernández-Padilla, E., Vázquez-Alonso, Á., López-Aymes, G., Aguilar-Tamayo, M. F., & Arce, E. (2025). Scientific thinking promotes the development of critical thinking in primary education. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091174
Dowd, J. E., Thompson, R. J., Jr., Schiff, L. A., & Reynolds, J. A. (2018). Understanding the complex relationship between critical thinking and science reasoning among undergraduate thesis writers. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 17(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-03-0052
Henríquez-Roldán, C. F., Bangdiwala, S. I., Barrera-Guajardo, R. I., & Bustos-Rubilar, Á. S. (2025). From hypothesis to conclusion: The essential role of statistics in science. Research in Statistics, 3(1), Article 2450532. https://doi.org/10.1080/27684520.2025.2450532
Hernández-Brenes, C., Rodríguez-Sánchez, D. G., Villarreal-Lara, R., Gonzalez Viejo, C., & Clorio-Carrillo, J. A. (2024). Impact of teaching multivariate modeling with digital tools on the development level of experimental data analysis and interpretation skills. Proceedings of the LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2024.1.1.2026
Irawan, F., Maghfiroh, H., Zubaidah, S., & Sulisetijono, S. (2024). The correlation between science literacy skills and scientific explanation on creative thinking skills through Remap-STAD learning model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3106(1), 070020. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0215201
Kharatmal, M., & Bhattacharya, A. (2025). Exploring and comparing the difficulties among undergraduate and postgraduate students’ understanding of experimentation using primary scientific literature. Journal of Biological Education, 59(3), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2024.2365667
Kreher, S. A., Pavlova, I. V., & Nelms, A. (2021). An active learning intervention based on evaluating alternative hypotheses increases scientific literacy of controlled experiments in introductory biology. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 22(3), e00172-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00172-21
Lau, P. N., Teow, Y., Low, X. T. T., & Tan, S. T. B. (2022). Integrating chemistry laboratory-tutorial timetabling with instructional design and the impact on learner perceptions and outcomes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00055e
Li, X., Xie, F., Li, X., Li, G., Chen, X., Lv, J., & Peng, C. (2020). Development, application, and evaluation of a problem-based learning method in clinical laboratory education. Clinica Chimica Acta, 510, 681–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.08.037
Marino, M. J. (2018). Statistical analysis in preclinical biomedical research. In Research in the Biomedical Sciences: Transparent and Reproducible (pp. 107–144). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804725-5.00003-3
Mustafa, N., Mohamed, Z., & Ubaidullah, N. H. (2020). Modeling of statistical reasoning and students’ academic performance relationship through partial least squares-structural equation model (PLS-SEM). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3519–3526. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080827
Pirlott, A. G., & Hines, J. C. (2025). Eliminating ANOVA hand calculations predicts improved mastery in an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 52(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283231183959
Ramirez, H. J. M. (2021). Facilitating computer-supported collaborative learning with question-asking scripting activity and its effects on students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking in science. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 29(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.29.01.003
Sari, S. A., Dewi, R. S., Saputra, K., Kembaren, A., Hasibuan, H., & Talib, C. A. (2025). Integration of analytical chemistry flipbooks based on project-based learning in improving critical thinking skills and scientific literacy to support SDG-4. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v14i1.21038
Schwichow, M., Brandenburger, M., Brandenburger, W., & Wilbers, J. (2022). Analysis of experimental design errors in elementary school: How do students identify, interpret, and justify controlled and confounded experiments? International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2015544
Taylor, C. J., Baker, A., Chapman, M. R., Reynolds, W. R., Jolley, K. E., Clemens, G., Smith, G. E., Blacker, A. J., Chamberlain, T. W., Christie, S. D. R., Taylor, B. A., & Bourne, R. A. (2021). Flow chemistry for process optimisation using design of experiments. Journal of Flow Chemistry, 11(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41981-020-00135-0
Trajkovski, V. (2016). How to select appropriate statistical test in scientific articles. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 17(3–4), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.19057/jser.2016.7
Unzueta, G., Eguren, J. A., & Zenigaonaindia, N. (2025). Practical training in industrial statistics and design of experiments in higher education. In Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies (Vol. 239, pp. 69–74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82334-3_13
Zarei, E. (2022). An experiment design to increase students’ conceptual perception of mathematical equations related to gas variables and laws. SN Social Sciences, 2(8), 133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00439-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


