Implementation of Computational Thinking in Physics Learning to Strengthen Analytical and Logical Reasoning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsme.v2i1.259Keywords:
Analytical Reasoning, Computational Thinking, Logical Reasoning, Physics Education, Problem-SolvingAbstract
This study explores the implementation of Computational Thinking (CT) in physics learning to enhance students' analytical and logical reasoning. Using an experimental approach with a problem-solving model, the research involved students enrolled in physics courses, divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group engaged in simulation-based and algorithmic problem-solving tasks, while the control group received conventional instruction. The research focused on assessing improvements in logical reasoning through pre- and post-tests. Data analysis was conducted quantitatively, comparing the pre-test and post-test results of both groups. Findings revealed that the experimental group showed a significant 31% improvement in logical reasoning skills, while the control group demonstrated a modest 5.8% improvement. This indicates that CT-based activities, such as simulations and algorithmic tasks, are more effective in enhancing students' analytical and problem-solving abilities compared to traditional methods. The study highlights the importance of integrating CT into physics education, as it promotes deeper cognitive engagement, critical thinking, and practical problem-solving skills. These findings suggest that CT strategies can be a powerful tool in improving students' reasoning abilities and better preparing them for complex scientific and real-world challenges.
References
Alkhatib, O. J., & Rahmani, M. (2024). Fostering problem-solving skills: A STEAM-oriented framework for engineering and non-engineering majors. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on TVET Excellence and Development (ICTeD 2024), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTeD62334.2024.10844609
Argaw, A. S., Haile, B. B., Ayalew, B. T., & Kuma, S. G. (2017). The effect of problem-based learning (PBL) instruction on students’ motivation and problem-solving skills of physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 857–871. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00647a
Aristawati, F. A., Budiyanto, C. W., & Yuana, R. A. (2018). Adopting Educational Robotics to Enhance Undergraduate Students’ Self Efficacy Levels of Computational Thinking. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special Issue), 42 50. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10255a
Arnell, J., Swanson, H., Edwards, B., Hart, K., Ghalehkohneh, S. J., & Edwards, J. (2024). "Instead of gravity pointing down, it’s now pointing up": Enhancing physics students’ connection between mathematics and mechanism. Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Arnell
Bagassi, M., Salerni, N., Castoldi, V., Sala, V., Caravona, L., Poli, F., & Macchi, L. (2020). Improving children’s logical and mathematical performance via a pragmatic approach. Frontiers in Education, 5, 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00054
Buell, C. A., Greenstein, S., & Wilstein, Z. (2017). Constructing an inquiry orientation from a learning theory perspective: Democratizing access through task design. PRIMUS, 27(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1194339
Chaisri, S., Chaijaroen, S., & Jackpeng, S. (2019). Theoretical framework of constructivist web-based learning environment model to enhance mathematical problem solving. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11937, 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35343-8_28
Das, S., & Mitra, A. (2024). Enhancing logic and problem-solving skills in the digital age. In Revolutionizing Curricula Through Computational Thinking, Logic, and Problem Solving (pp. 40–59). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1974-1.ch003
Dehbozorgi, N., & Roopaei, M. (2024). Improving computational thinking competencies in STEM higher education. 2024 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEC61299.2024.10664997
Demir, K., Çaka, C., Yaman, N. D., İslamoğlu, H., & Kuzu, A. (2022). Examining the current definitions of computational thinking. In Research anthology on computational thinking, programming, and robotics in the classroom (Vol. 1, pp. 223–252). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2411-7.ch011
Faisal, N., Chadhar, M., Stranieri, A., & Goriss-Hunter, A. (2023). ERPsim’s effects on students’ problem-solving skills in the context of supply chain management: A qualitative study. Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2023).
Fofonov, A., & Linsen, L. (2018). A top-down interactive visual analysis approach for physical simulation ensembles at different aggregation levels. Information (Switzerland), 9(7), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9070163
Gambrell, J., & Brewe, E. (2024). Analyzing interviews on computational thinking for introductory physics students: Toward a generalized assessment. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 010128. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010128
Herlina, K., Abdurrahman, A., Umam, A. N., Nurjanah, A., Rabbani, G. F., & Pratiwi, F. A. I. (2025). Expression-based e-worksheet (EBEW): An effort to enhance student’ computational thinking skills. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 15(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2210
Hernández-Suarez, C. A., Paz-Montes, L. S., & Avendaño Castro, W. R. (2022). Problem solving in the physics classroom: An analysis with secondary school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2163(1), 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2163/1/012010
Jafari Ghalehkohneh, S., Arnell, J., Hart, K., Swanson, H., Edwards, B., & Edwards, J. (2025). Upper-division physics simulations with equation manipulation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 010151. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010151
Kramer, H. M., & Bonham, S. W. (2024). Framing: A lens to understand and address student difficulties with Visual Python in university physics. Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Kramer
Kumar, I., & Mohd, N. (2024). Ways of using computational thinking to improve students' ability to think critically. In Infrastructure possibilities and human-centered approaches with Industry 5.0 (pp. 253–266). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0782-3.ch015
Lane, W. B., Galanti, T. M., & Rozas, X. L. (2023). Physics teachers’ motivations to learn computational thinking as a re-novicing experience. Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2023.pr.Lane
Manu, F. A., Ramaila, S., & Ramnarain, U. (2025). The role of Arduino-assisted robotics coding application in physics learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning, 32(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7971/CGP/v32i02/189-211
Markovits, H., & de Chantal, P.-L. (2020). The semantic retrieval model and divergent thinking as critical to understanding logical reasoning in children. In Critical Thinking and Reasoning: Theory, Development, Instruction, and Assessment (pp. 81–98). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004444591_006
Milbourne, J., & Wiebe, E. (2018). The role of content knowledge in ill-structured problem solving for high school physics students. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9564-4
Morze, N., Barna, O., & Boiko, M. (2022). The relevance of training primary school teachers computational thinking. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3104, 141–153.
Obbo, J., Dillmann, B., & Adorno, D. P. (2024). A 5E-based learning experience to introduce concepts relevant in quantum physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2727(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2727/1/012014
Palop, B., Díaz, I., Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J., & Santaengracia, J. J. (2025). Redefining computational thinking: A holistic framework and its implications for K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(10), 13385–13410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13297-4
Pirzado, F. A., Ahmed, A., Hussain, S., Ibarra-Vázquez, G., & Terashima-Marin, H. (2025). Assessing computational thinking in engineering and computer science students: A multi-method approach. Education Sciences, 15(3), 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030344
Rodrigues, R. N., Costa, C., & Martins, F. (2024). Integration of computational thinking in initial teacher training for primary schools: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1330065. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1330065
Sattar, F., & Nawaz, M. (2023). Developing computational thinking in STEM education with drones. In IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON 2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125117
Wang, Y., Xu, Z.-L., Lou, J.-Y., & Chen, K.-D. (2023). Factors influencing the complex problem-solving skills in reflective learning. BMC Medical Education, 23, 382. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04326-w
Woleński, J. (2016). Logic in the light of cognitive science. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 48(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0057
Wu, P., & Wu, H. (2024). Digital literacy and computational thinking in STEM education. Journal of Science Education, 28(3), 145–162.
Yadav, A., & Berthelsen, U. D. (2021). Computational thinking in education: A pedagogical perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102991
Yadav, A., Good, J., Voogt, J., & Fisser, P. (2017). Computational thinking as an emerging competence domain. In Technical and Vocational Education and Training (Vol. 23, pp. 1051–1067). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_49
Yafie, E., Nirmala, B., Kurniawaty, L., Bakri, T. S. M., Hani, A. B., & Setyaningsih, D. (2020). Supporting cognitive development through multimedia learning and scientific approach: An experimental study in preschool. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11C), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082313
Zhong, W., Wang, S., Tang, D., Xu, Z., Guo, D., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Yin, J., Zhou, M., & Duan, N. (2022). Analytical reasoning of text. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022 (pp. 2306–2319). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.177
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
