Performance Evaluation of Edge Computing Architecture for Latency Reduction in Real-Time Distributed Monitoring Systems

Authors

  • Refi Riduan Achmad Department of Informatics Engineering, Nahdlatul Ulama University of East Kalimantan
  • Yoas Department of nformatics Engineering, Nahdlatul Ulama University of East Kalimantan
  • Boimin Department of nformatics Engineering, Nahdlatul Ulama University of East Kalimantan
  • Abdul Karim Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
  • Leonel Hernandez Institución Universitaria de Barranquilla IUB, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijamc.v3i3.292

Keywords:

Edge Computing, Real-time monitoring, Distributed systems, Latency reduction, Internet of Things

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and real-time monitoring applications has intensified the demand for low-latency, reliable, and scalable data processing in distributed systems. Conventional cloud-centric architectures, although flexible and scalable, often suffer from high end-to-end latency, bandwidth congestion, and dependency on continuous network connectivity, making them less suitable for latency-sensitive monitoring applications. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an edge computing–based architecture in reducing latency and improving overall system performance in real-time distributed monitoring systems. A multi-layer architecture consisting of edge, fog, and cloud layers is proposed, where data processing tasks are partially offloaded to edge nodes located closer to IoT sensors. The proposed system integrates load balancing using the least connection algorithm and data caching mechanisms to optimize request handling and minimize network overhead. The architecture is implemented and evaluated in a real-world monitoring scenario involving 100 IoT sensors distributed across multiple locations. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed edge-based approach significantly outperforms a conventional cloud-only architecture. The average end-to-end latency is reduced by 73.4%, from 245 ms to 65 ms, while system throughput increases by 58.3%. In addition, packet loss is reduced from 3.2% to 0.4%, and bandwidth usage to the cloud is decreased by approximately 68% due to local processing and data aggregation at the edge layer. These findings indicate that integrating edge computing with load balancing and caching mechanisms can effectively enhance the performance, reliability, and scalability of real-time distributed monitoring systems. The study concludes that edge computing provides a practical and efficient solution for meeting strict latency requirements in modern IoT-based monitoring applications.

References

Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010

Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012). Fog computing and its role in the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the First MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing (pp. 13–16). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2342509.2342513

Chiang, M., & Zhang, T. (2016). Fog and IoT: An overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(6), 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2584538

Elbamby, M. S., Bennis, M., & Debbah, M. (2019). Wireless edge computing with latency and reliability guarantees. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 67(12), 8734–8753. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2019.2935039

Gupta, H., Dastjerdi, A. V., Ghosh, S. K., & Buyya, R. (2017). iFogSim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in IoT, edge and fog computing environments. Software: Practice and Experience, 47(9), 1275–1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2509

Ha, K., Chen, Z., Hu, W., Richter, W., Pillai, P., & Satyanarayanan, M. (2014). Towards wearable cognitive assistance. In Proceedings of the ACM MobiSys (pp. 68–81). https://doi.org/10.1145/2594368.2594383

Kautish, S., Khan, M. A., & Khan, M. A. (2025). A systematic literature review of software, hardware, and security challenges in edge computing. IEEE Access, 13, 76709–76794. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3451023

Khan, W. Z., Ahmed, E., Hakak, S., Yaqoob, I., & Ahmed, A. (2019). Edge computing: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97, 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.050

Kim, M., Lee, J., & Park, S. (2024). Distributed task offloading and resource allocation for latency-aware edge computing in 6G networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 23(10), 10675–10689. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2024.3389217

Kumar, N., Zeadally, S., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2017). QoS-aware hierarchical web service composition for smart city systems. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(3), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600563

Li, C., Xue, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, W., & Li, T. (2018). Edge-oriented computing paradigms: A survey on architecture design and system management. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3154815

Mach, P., & Becvar, Z. (2017). Mobile edge computing: A survey on architecture and computation offloading. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), 1628–1656. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2682318

Mao, Y., You, C., Zhang, J., Huang, K., & Letaief, K. B. (2017). A survey on mobile edge computing: The communication perspective. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(4), 2322–2358. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2745201

Pan, J., & McElhannon, J. (2018). Future edge cloud and edge computing for Internet of Things applications. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(1), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2767608

Satyanarayanan, M. (2017). The emergence of edge computing. Computer, 50(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.9

Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2016). Edge computing: Vision and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(5), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198

Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Mada, B., Flinck, H., Dutta, S., & Sabella, D. (2017). On multi-access edge computing: A survey of the emerging 5G network edge cloud architecture. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), 1657–1681. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2705720

Yi, S., Hao, Z., Qin, Z., & Li, Q. (2015). Fog computing: Platform and applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE HotWeb (pp. 73–78). https://doi.org/10.1109/HotWeb.2015.22

Yousefpour, A., Fung, C., Nguyen, T., Kadiyala, K., Jalali, F., Niakanlahiji, A., Kong, J., & Jue, J. P. (2019). All one needs to know about fog computing and related edge computing paradigms. Journal of Systems Architecture, 98, 289–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.02.009

Zhang, Q., Zhang, X., Shi, W., & Zhong, H. (2016). Firework: Big data sharing and processing in collaborative edge environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE HotWeb (pp. 20–25). https://doi.org/10.1109/HotWeb.2016.12

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03

How to Cite

Achmad, R. R., Yoas, Boimin, Karim, A., & Hernandez, L. (2026). Performance Evaluation of Edge Computing Architecture for Latency Reduction in Real-Time Distributed Monitoring Systems. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 3(3), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijamc.v3i3.292

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): July: International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.