Optimizing Bandwidth Settings Using the Y.1731 Method Based on Ethernet OAM on Raisecom Devices in a Metro Ethernet Network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijamc.v2i4.283Keywords:
Bandwidth, Ethernet OAM, Metro Ethernet, QoS, RaisecomAbstract
The rapid development of network infrastructure demands high Quality of Service (QoS), especially in Metro Ethernet networks widely utilized by telecommunication service providers. A primary challenge is efficient bandwidth management to ensure network stability and performance. This research aims to optimize bandwidth management by implementing the Y.1731 method based on Ethernet Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) on Raisecom devices. The methodology employed is a quantitative experimental approach based on technical simulation within an Professional Network Emulator Tool Lab (PNET Lab), where real-time network performance measurements are conducted using the ITU-T Y.1731 protocol for key parameters such as delay, jitter, and packet loss on Raisecom devices (represented by Cisco routers). The expected outcomes include increased efficiency in bandwidth utilization through more adaptive allocation, comprehensive and accurate real-time network performance monitoring capabilities, validation of OAM functions on Raisecom devices, improved Quality of Service (QoS) and better Service Level Agreement (SLA) attainment, and the provision of technical recommendations for network management. The implementation of Y.1731 is anticipated to quickly detect and respond to service degradation, thereby providing a strong basis for decision-making in network management and contributing to the enhancement of service quality in Metro Ethernet networks through optimization based on proactive monitoring.
References
Autenrieth, A., Kirstädter, A., & Edmaier, B. (2006). Carrier grade metro Ethernet networks.
Bidkar, S., Gumaste, A., Ghodasara, P., & Kushwaha, A. (2015). Scalable segment routing: A new paradigm for efficient service provider networking using carrier Ethernet advances. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.7.000445
Bidkar, S., Gumaste, A., Ghodasara, P., & Kushwaha, A. (2017). Field trial of a software defined network (SDN) using carrier Ethernet and segment routing in a tier-1 provider. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.9.000711
Bidkar, S., Gumaste, A., Ghodasara, P., et al. (2008). Field trial SDN with carrier Ethernet & segment routing. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTS.2008.4937766
Business Research Insights. (2024). Metro Ethernet services market size, share, trends, and growth forecast. https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/market-reports/metro-ethernet-services-market-105345
Cisco Systems. (2018). Performance monitoring with CCM in Ethernet.
Credence Research. (2024). Metro Ethernet market size, share, trends analysis report 2024–2032. https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/metro-ethernet-market
Ferrari, G., & Christen, K. O. (2010). Carrier Ethernet for mobile backhaul. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2010.5594682
Glamočanin, D. (2017). Migration to next gen optical carrier Ethernet. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/200/1/012028
Gomes, N. J., Jäntti, R., Kämäräinen, J., & Perälä, P. (2018). Boosting 5G through Ethernet: How evolved fronthaul can take next-generation mobile to the next level. https://doi.org/10.1109/MVEH.2018.8200834
Hofstede, A., Drago, M., Moura, G., & Pras, A. (2008). Carrier Ethernet OAM: An overview and comparison to IP OAM. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTS.2008.4937766
Indukuri, N. (2011). Pseudowire VCCV-BFD vs Ethernet OAM. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21484-4_14
Jahanshahi, M., & Bistouni, F. (2019). Reliability-aware ring protection link selection in Ethernet ring mesh networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106575
Juniper Networks. (2025). Ethernet OAM overview. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/network-mgmt/topics/topic-map/oam-service-overview.html
Lee, K. K., Ryoo, J. D., & Joo, B. S. (2018). Faultless protection methods in self-healing Ethernet ring networks. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.12.1812.0102
Lucena, A. A. B., Lindgren, A., & Nucciello, A. (2009). A survey of advanced Ethernet forwarding approaches. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2009.090108
Minei, I., Strassner, J., & Pyda, A. (2016). Packet transport OAM. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2602412
Nugroho, A. (2020). Analisis quality of service (QoS) jaringan Metro Ethernet di Kota Samarinda. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/181834
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/97880/perpres-no-95-tahun-2018
Rathore, V. (2012). The evolution of carrier Ethernet.
Ryoo, J. D., Song, J., & Park, J. H. (2008). OAM and its performance monitoring mechanisms for carrier Ethernet transport networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2008.4463778
Vaez-Ghaemi, R. (2007). Wireless backhaul for LTE: OAM considerations.
Ventre, P. L., Salsano, S., Polverini, M., & Cianfrani, A. (2019). OAM and segment routing for resilience. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.03471
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
